Telephone Social Support and Education for Adaptation to Prostate Cancer: A Pilot Study

Kathleen Walsh Scura

Wendy Budin

Ellen Garfing

ONF 2004, 31(2), 335-338. DOI: 10.1188/04.ONF.335-338

Purpose/Objectives: To evaluate the feasibility of an intervention of telephone social support and education to increase the physical, emotional, functional, and interpersonal adaptation of men to prostate cancer.

Design: Prospective, random assignment to experimental or control treatments.

Setting: Urban New Jersey.

Sample: 17 men diagnosed with prostate cancer within four weeks of study entry. Mean age was 66 years (range = 51-78); 59% were Caucasian, 35% were African American, and 6% were American Indian.

Methods: Subjects in the experimental group received telephone social support over a 12-month period in addition to education via mailed resource kits. The control group received education through mailed resource kits only. The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Scale—General Physical, Emotional, Functional, and Social/Family Well-Being subscales; Symptom Experience Scale—Prostate; and the Relationship Change Scale were administered initially and at the end of each of the three phases; the International Index of Erectile Function Scale was administered at the end of each of the three phases. Qualitative information was gathered throughout and at the conclusion of the study.

Main Research Variables: Physiologic, emotional, functional, and social adaptation to prostate cancer.

Findings: Results were somewhat more favorable for the experimental group on all outcome measures; however, differences were not statistically significant. Structured interviews with 14 of 17 subjects revealed that telephone social support and education were effective in increasing adaptation to prostate cancer.

Conclusions: Despite the lack of a significant difference between the experimental and treatment groups in this small sample of men, analysis of trends and interview feedback indicated that telephone social support, in addition to education through a mailed resource kit, has the potential to be beneficial by increasing access to supportive services.

Implications for Nursing: Telephone social support when supplementing patient education may assist men in adapting during the year following a prostate cancer diagnosis.

Jump to a section


    American Cancer Society. (2004). Cancer facts and figures, 2004. Atlanta, GA: Author.

    Cella, D.F., Tulsky, D., Gray, G., Sarafian, B., Linn, E., Bonomi, A., et al. (1993). The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Scale: Development and validation of the general measure. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 11, 570-579.

    Champion, V., Skinner, C., & Foster, J. (2000). The effects of standard care counseling and telephone/in-person counseling on beliefs, knowledge, and behavior related to mammography screening. Oncology Nursing Forum, 27, 1565-1571.

    Fitch, M.I., Gray, R., Franssen, E., & Johnson, B. (2000). Men's perspectives on the impact of prostate cancer: Implications for oncology nurses. Oncology Nursing Forum, 27, 1255-1263.

    Galbraith, M.E., Ramirez, J.M., & Pedro, L.W. (2001). Quality of life, health outcomes, and identity for patients with prostate cancer in five different treatment groups. Oncology Nursing Forum, 28, 551-560.

    Guerney, B.G. (1977). Relationship enhancement. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Litwin, M.S., McGuigan, K.A., Shpall, A.I., & Dhanani, N. (1999). Recovery of health related quality of life in the year after radical prostatectomy: Early experience. Journal of Urology, 161, 515-519.

    Maliski, S.L., Heilemann, M.V., & McCorkle, R. (2001). Mastery of postprostatectomy incontinence and impotence: His work, her work, our work. Oncology Nursing Forum, 28, 985-992.

    Rosen, R., Riley, A., Wagner, G., Osterloh, I.H., Kirkpatrick, J., & Mishra, A. (1997). The International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF): A multidimensional scale for assessment of erectile dysfunction. Urology, 49, 822-830.

    Roy, C., & Andrews, H.A. (1999). The Roy Adaptation Model (2nd ed.). Stamford, CT: Appleton and Lange.

    Samarel, N., Fawcett, J., Tulman, L., Rothman, H., Spector, L., Spillane, P.A., et al. (1999). A resource kit for women with breast cancer: Development and evaluations. Oncology Nursing Forum, 26, 611-618.

    Samarel, N., Leddy, S.K., Greco, K., Cooley, M.E., Torres, S.C., Tulman, L., et al. (1996). Development and testing of the Symptom Experience Scale. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 12, 221-228.

    Siegel, K., Mesagno, P., Karus, D.G., & Christ, G. (1992). Reducing the prevalence of unmet needs for concrete services of patients with cancer. Cancer, 69, 1873-1883.

    Stanford, J.L., Feng, Z., Hamilton, A., Gilliland, F., Stephenson, R.A., Eley, J.W., et al. (2000). Urinary and sexual function after radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer. JAMA, 283, 354-360.

    Walker, B.L., Nail, L.M., Larsen, L., Magill, J., & Schwartz, A. (1996). Concerns, affect, and cognitive disruption following completion of radiation treatment for localized breast or prostate cancer. Oncology Nursing Forum, 23, 1181-1187.