An Integrative Review of Nursing Research on Active Surveillance in an Older Adult Prostate Cancer Population

Lydia T. Madsen

Lene Symes

integrative review, nursing research, surveillance, prostate cancer
ONF 2013, 40(4), 374-382. DOI: 10.1188/13.ONF.40-04AP

Problem Identification: To summarize the current state of nursing knowledge regarding the management of older adult men with prostate cancer with active surveillance as the treatment strategy.

Literature Search: Publications of nursing research from January 2003 to March 2012 addressing patients with prostate cancer undergoing an active surveillance treatment management strategy.

Data Evaluation and Analysis: A paradigm shift in the recommendation to consider active surveillance is apparent in the literature. Since 2003, active surveillance has become a more frequent recommendation as the management approach for low-risk, small-volume prostate cancers. Current nursing literature provides data on decision making and the uncertainty associated with active surveillance; however, minimal information is available that specifically addresses the needs of the aging adult population with prostate cancer. In addition, the trajectory of adaptation has only been preliminarily identified within the body of nursing knowledge; the actions that promote or obstruct successful adaptation to active surveillance as a treatment approach require in-depth study.

Presentation of Findings: Active surveillance has relevance for the aging population while providing a potential means to judiciously allocate medical resources and expenses within the healthcare delivery system. The nurse researcher, in partnership with the advanced practice nurse, should proactively address the multifaceted needs of this patient population.

Implications for Nursing Practice: Active surveillance, as a program of cooperative, intentional, and prescribed monitoring of prostate cancer with a clearly defined strategy for management, is ideally suited for nursing research into the adaptation, educational needs, and management of chronic disease processes of older adult men while advancing the educator and provider roles of the advanced practice nurse.

Knowledge Translation: Active surveillance is an appropriate treatment option in older men with low-risk, low-volume prostate cancer. However, this treatment also is a source of uncertainty. Targeted, ongoing nursing education about active surveillance as treatment must address this uncertainty in this patient population so patients are comfortable with planned monitoring.

Jump to a section


    Abrahamsson, P. A. (2009). Prostate cancer: To treat or not to treat? European Urology Supplements, 8, 418-423. doi:10.1016/j.eursup .2009.01.007
    Albertsen, P. C. (2011). When is active surveillance the appropriate treatment for prostate cancer? Acta Oncologica, 50(Suppl. 1), 120-126. doi:10.3109/0284186X.2010.526634
    American Cancer Society. (2012). What are the key statistics about prostate cancer? Retrieved from
    Bailey, D., Wallace, M., Landerman, R., Albala, D., Polascik, T., & Robertson, C. (2009). Psychosocial trajectories of men undergoing active surveillance for prostate cancer [Abstract 3902]. Oncology Nursing Forum. Retrieved from
    Bailey, D. E., Mishel, M. H., Belyea, M., Stewart, J. L., & Mohler, J. (2004). Uncertainty intervention for watchful waiting in prostate cancer. Cancer Nursing, 27, 339-346. doi:10.1097/00002820-2004 09000-00001
    Bailey, D. E., Wallace, M., Latini, D. M., Hegarty, J., Carroll, P. R., Klein, E. A., & Albertsen, P. C. (2011). Measuring illness uncertainty in men undergoing active surveillance for prostate cancer. Applied Nursing Research, 24, 193-199.
    Bailey, D. E., Wallace, M., & Mishel, M. H. (2007). Watching, waiting, and uncertainty in prostate cancer. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 16, 734-741. doi:10.1016/j.apnr.2009.08.001
    Birnie, K., & Robinson, J. (2010). Helping patients with localized prostate cancer reach treatment decisions. Canadian Family Physician, 56, 137-141.
    Cooperberg, M. R., Carroll, P., & Klotz, L. (2011). Active surveillance for prostate cancer: Progress and promise. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 29, 3669-3676. doi:10.1200/JCO.2011.34.9738
    Corcoran, A. T., Peele, P. B., & Benoit, R. M. (2010). Cost comparison between watchful waiting with active surveillance and active treatment of clinically localized prostate cancer. Urology, 76, 703-709. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2009.12.071
    Davison, B. J., & Goldenberg, S. L. (2011). Patient acceptance of active surveillance as a treatment option for low-risk prostate cancer. BJU International, 108, 1787-1793. doi:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10200.x
    Davison, B. J., Oliffe, J. L., Pickles, T., & Mroz, L. (2009). Factors influencing men undertaking active surveillance for the management of low-risk prostate cancer. Oncology Nursing Forum, 36, 89-96. doi:10.1188/09.ONF.89-96
    Ervik, B., Nordoy, T., & Asplund, K. (2010). Hit by waves—Living with local, advanced, or localized prostate cancer treated with endocrine therapy or under active surveillance. Cancer Nursing, 33, 382-389. doi:10.1097/NCC.0b013e3181d1c8ea
    Gorin, M. A., Soloway, C. T., Eldefraway, A., & Soloway, M. S. (2011). Factors that influence patient enrollment in active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer. Urology, 77, 588-591. doi:10.1016/j.urology .2010.10.039
    Hayes, J. H., Ollendorf, D. A., Pearson, S. D., Barry, M. J., Kantoff, P. W., Stewart, S. T., … McMahon, P. M. (2010). Active surveillance compared with initial treatment for men with low-risk prostate cancer: A decision analysis. JAMA, 304, 2373-2380. doi:10.1001/jama.2010.1720
    Hedestig, O., Sandman, P., & Widmark, A. (2003). Living with untreated localized prostate cancer: A qualitative analysis of patient narratives. Cancer Nursing, 26, 55-60. doi:10.1097/00002820-2003 02000-00008
    Hegarty, J., & Bailey, D. E. (2011). Active surveillance as a treatment option for prostate cancer. Seminars in Oncology Nursing, 27, 260-266. doi:10.1016/j.soncn.2011.07.004
    Kazer, M. W., Bailey, D. E., Colberg, J., Kelly, W. K., & Carroll, P. (2011). The needs for men undergoing active surveillance (AS) for prostate cancer: Results of a focus group study. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 20(3-4), 581-586. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03489.x
    Kazer, M. W., Bailey, D. E., Sanda, M., Colberg, J., & Kelly, W. K. (2011). An Internet intervention for management of uncertainty during active surveillance for prostate cancer. Oncology Nursing Forum, 38, 560-568. doi:10.1188/11.ONF.561-568
    Kazer, M. W., Bailey, D. E., & Whittemore, R. (2010). Out of the black box: Expansion of a theory-based intervention to self-manage the uncertainty associated with active surveillance (AS) for prostate cancer. Research and Theory for Nursing Practice, 24, 101-112.
    Kilpatrick, F. P., & Cantril, H. (1960). Self-anchoring scaling: A measure of individual's unique reality worlds. Journal of Individual Psychology, 16, 158-173.
    Klotz, L. (2010). Active surveillance for prostate cancer: Patient selection and management. Current Oncology, 17(Suppl. 2), S11-S17. doi:10.3747/co.v17i0.713
    Klotz, L., Zhang, L., Lam, A., Nam, R., Mamedov, A., & Loblaw, A. (2010). Clinical results of long-term follow-up of a large, active surveillance cohort with localized prostate cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 28, 126-131. doi:10.1200/JCO.2009.24.2180
    Konety, B. R. (2009). Prostate specific antigen screening and active surveillance in the elderly. Journal of Urology, 181, 1534-1535. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2009.01.065
    Lawrentschuk, N., & Klotz, L. (2011). Active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer: An update. Nature Reviews. Urology, 8, 312-320.
    Madsen, L. T., & Symes, L. (2012). A concept analysis on active surveillance. Unpublished manuscript.
    Mishel, M. H. (1990). Reconceptualization of the Uncertainty of Illness Theory. Image: The Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 22, 256-262. doi:10.1111/j.1547-5069.1990.tb00225.x
    Mishel, M. H. (1997). Uncertainty in acute illness. Annual Review of Nursing Research, 15, 57-80.
    Mishel, M. H., Belyea, M., Germino, B. B., Stewart, J. L., Bailey, D. E., Robertson, C., & Mohler, J. (2002). Helping patients with localized prostate carcinoma manage uncertainty and treatment side effects: Nurse-delivered psychoeducational intervention over the telephone. Cancer, 94, 1854-1866. doi:10.1002/cncr.10390
    National Institutes of Health. (2011). NIH State-of-the-Science Conference: Role of active surveillance in the management of men with localized prostate cancer. Retrieved from
    Oliffe, J. L., Davison, B. J., Pickles, T., & Mroz, L. (2009). The self-management of uncertainty among men undertaking active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer. Qualitative Health Research, 19, 432-443. doi:10.1177/1049732309332692
    Roberts, C. B., Albertsen, P. C., Shao, Y. H., Moore, D. F., Mehta, A. R., Stein, M. N., & Lu-Yao, G. (2011). Patterns and correlates of prostate cancer treatment in older men. American Journal of Medicine, 124, 235-243. doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2010.10.016
    Roy, S. C. (2009). The Roy Adaptation Model (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
    Schacham, S. (1983). A shortened version of the Profile of Mood States. Journal of Personality Assessment, 47, 305-306. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa4703_14
    Siegel, R., Naishadham, D., & Jemal, A. (2012). Cancer statistics, 2012. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 62, 10-29. doi:10.3322/caac.20138
    Stangelberger, A., Waldert, M., & Djavan, B. (2008). Prostate cancer in elderly men. Reviews in Urology, 10, 111-119.
    Thompson, I., & Klotz, L. (2010). Active surveillance for prostate cancer. JAMA, 304, 2411-2412. doi:10.1001/jama.2010.1761
    Van den Bergh, R. C., Essink-Bot, M., Roobol, M. J., Wolters, T., Schroder, F. H., Bangma, C. H., & Steyerberg, E. W. (2009). Anxiety and distress during active surveillance for early prostate cancer. Cancer, 115, 3868-3878. doi:10.1002/cncr.24446
    Wallace, M. (2003). Uncertainty and quality of life of older men who undergo watchful waiting for prostate cancer. Oncology Nursing Forum, 30, 303-309. doi:10.1188/03.ONF.303-309
    Walsh Scura, K., Budin, W., & Garfing, E. (2004). Telephone social support and education for adaptation to prostate cancer: A pilot study. Oncology Nursing Forum, 31, 335-338. doi:10.1188/04.ONF.335-338