Gatt, M., Willis, S., & Leuschner, S. (2016). A meta-analysis of the effectiveness and safety of kinesiology taping in the management of cancer-related lymphoedema. European Journal of Cancer Care. Advance online publication.
STUDY PURPOSE: To determine the effectiveness and safety of kinesiology taping (KT) compared to compression bandaging
TYPE OF STUDY: Meta-analysis and systematic review
PHASE OF CARE: Late effects and survivorship
No statistically significant difference existed between KT and compression bandaging, although the analysis showed overall results in favor of compression bandaging with or without CDT. In five of the six studies, 10%–21% dropped out because of skin-related adverse events. Skin adverse events were reported only in KT groups. The findings regarding patient discomfort or satisfaction with the intervention were mixed. Reported limb reduction volumes varied widely. Four or five studies in the meta-analysis showed greater limb reduction volume in the compression bandaging group.
KT produced lower limb reduction volume and was associated with more skin adverse effects. No difference existed in patient comfort with KT versus compression bandages.
The findings of this analysis did not provide strong support for the use of KT because no better volume reduction existed and it was associated with more skin problems. If used in clinical practice, KT should be used with caution in patients where bandaging cannot be used. No evidence exists regarding KT use other than for upper extremity lymphedema in this review.