Ost, D.E., Ernst, A., Grosu, H.B., Lei, X., Diaz-Mendoza, J., Slade, M., . . . AQuIRE Bronchoscopy Registry. (2015). Therapeutic bronchoscopy for malignant central airway obstruction: Success rates and impact on dyspnea and quality of life. Chest, 147, 1282–1298.
To measure the technical success of therapeutic bronchoscopy and its impact in improving dyspnea and quality of life among patients with malignant central airway obstruction
Data from the AQuIRE (American College of Chest Physicians Quality Improvement Registry) for 1,115 procedures on 947 patients undergoing therapeutic bronchoscopy from January 2009–February 2013 were used for this study. Primary outcome data were defined as greater than a 50% opening of airway lumen. A smaller subset (N = 187) of centers collected pre- and postprocedure (30 days) secondary outcome data looking at dyspnea improvement after bronchoscopy as measured via Borg scores and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) measured via the SF-6D.
The use of therapeutic bronchoscopy for the treatment of malignant central airway obstruction had a high technical success rate. More importantly, patients showed significant improvement in their subjective rating of dyspnea and in HRQOL. Having clinical outcome data assists in the process of weighing potential risks versus benefits of this procedure. Given that some of the patients with the worst dyspnea at baseline ultimately had the greatest benefit, these patients should be considered for therapeutic bronchoscopy and not assumed to be too sick to benefit.
To educate and advocate for patients undergoing therapeutic bronchoscopies, nurses must be knowledgeable about the different types, purpose, indications, and potential risks and benefits of each. The technical success of the procedure is not sufficient enough in measuring the overall benefit to the patient; quality of life and palliation of dyspnea outcomes must also be considered.