ONS Guidelines Article

Supplementary Material for Systematic Review of Cancer Treatment-Related Lymphedema

lymphedema, evidence-based interventions

Table of Contents

  • Search strategy
  • Figure S1. Risk of lymphedema (other interventions)
  • Figure S2. Change in physical activity
  • Figure S3. Grip strength
  • Figure S4. Range of motion
  • Figure S5. Risk of bias assessment for randomized clinical trials
  • Figure S6. Risk of bias assessment for observational studies and non-randomized clinical trials
  • Table S1. Protocol of cancer related lymphedema guideline and systematic review
  • Table S2. Characteristics of studies in the meta-analysis by comparison
  • Table S3. Certainty of evidence of the studies included in the meta-analysis
  • Table S4. Characteristics of included studies comparing Progressive resistance training (RRT) vs Usual care
  • Table S5. Characteristics of included studies comparing Compression vs No compression
  • Table S6. Characteristics of included studies comparing Manual lymph drainage (MLD) vs No MLD
  • Table S7. Characteristics of included studies comparing Manual lymph drainage (MLD) vs Exercise
  • Table S8. Characteristics of included studies comparing Exercise vs No exercise
  • Table S9. Characteristics of included studies comparing Delayed exercise vs Early exercise
  • Table S10. Characteristics of included studies comparing Physiotherapy vs No physiotherapy
  • Table S11. Characteristics of included studies comparing Surveillance, education, or clinical care vs No intervention or standard care
  • References

 

Jump to a section

    References