Shaw, S.Z., Nien, H.H., Wu, C.J., Lui, L.T., Su, J.F., & Lang, C.H. (2013). 3M Cavilon No-Sting Barrier Film or topical corticosteroid (mometasone furoate) for protection against radiation dermatitis: A clinical trial. Journal of the Formosan Medical Association.
To investigate the effect of 3M™ Cavilon™ No-Sting Barrier Film and topical corticosteroids on irradiated skin
Thirty-nine post-operative patients with breast cancer were assigned to the three intervention groups using simple randomization. The three treatment groups included 3M barrier film versus no treatment [n = 13], Elomet® (mometasone furoate [corticosteroid] cream) versus no treatment [n = 9], and Elomet versus 3M barrier film [n = 17]. Each participant’s treatment field was divided in half so that she received both radiodermatitis treatments assigned to the group. Elomet and 3M film barrier were applied every other day, excluding weekends, by the same staff, and the reactions were observed. For patients with more advanced disease, chest wall recurrence, or lymph node involvement, those areas also were irradiated. The skin reactions in the neck and supraclavicular areas were not included in the study. The primary end points were time to onset of grade 1 pruritus, a pain score of 3, and presence of grade 2 dermatitis. The secondary end points were grade 3 radiodermatitis and pain scores by each treatment.
Open-label clinical trial of barrier film or corticosteroid cream, versus no treatment to prevent/reduce grade 1 pruritus, grade 2–3 radiodermatitis, and pain score of 3.
The authors recommend using the barrier film starting at the commencement of treatment to reduce friction and irritation, particularly in skin folds and the axilla. However, study findings here do not show an effect on development of radiodermatitis. Once pain and hyperemia occur, the barrier film is discontinued and corticosteroid cream started. The effectiveness of corticosteroid on prevention of radiodermatitis should be investigated further under a lager randomized study.
The effectiveness of corticosteroids on prevention of radiodermatitis should be investigated further in a large, randomized, controlled clinical trial with adequate power to detect clinically significant differences and controlling for confounding factors.
Shaw, C., Mortimer, P., & Judd, P.A. (2007). Randomized controlled trial comparing a low-fat diet with a weight-reduction diet in breast cancer-related lymphedema. Cancer, 109(10), 1949–1956.
To evaluate whether using dietary interventions could be beneficial in the treament of arm lymphedema in patients who have breast cancer-related lymphedema
The study used a randomized controlled trial design with two interventions and one control group.
Results showed significant reduction in body weight (p = 0.006), body mass index (p = 0.008), and skin fold thickness measured at four sites (p = 0.044) in the weight-reduction and low-fat groups but not in the control group. There was a reduction in excessive arm volume over the 24 weeks but no significant difference between groups. There was a significant correlation between weight loss and a reduction in excess am volume irrespective of the dietary group (p < 0.002). Weight loss for the control, weight-reduction, and low-fat groups were 60%, 95%, and 76%, respectively. Weight reduction appears to be an effective means of assisting in the reduction of arm volume during the treatment of the lymphedema arm.
A good study that identifies an important risk factor and intervention.
Shaw, E.G., Rosdhal, R., D'Agostino, R.B., Lovato, J., Naughton, M.J., Robbins, M.E., & Rapp, S.R. (2006). Phase II study of donepezil in irradiated brain tumor patients: Effect on cognitive function, mood, and quality of life. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 24, 1415–1420.
Participants initially were given donepezil 5 mg per day. After 6 weeks, dosage was increased to 10 mg per day for a total of 18 weeks. Treatment then was discontinued for a six-week washout period. Patients, therefore, served as their own control at two points (baseline and post-washout). After week 30, patients were given the choice to continue using donepezil at 10 mg per day. Patient outcomes were assessed at baseline and at week 6, 12, 24, and 30 (following the washout period).
The donepezil intervention group demonstrated a significant improvement in fatigue from baseline to 24 months as shown by the POMS subscale for fatigue (p = 0.03).
Shaw, E.G., Rosdhal, R., D’Agostino, R.B., Lovato, J. Naughton, M.J., Robbins, M.E., & Rapp, S.R. (2006). Phase II study of donepezil in irradiated brain tumor patients: Effect on cognitive function, mood, and quality of life. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 24(9), 1415–1420.
The study was conducted to determine whether donepezil improved cognitive functioning, mood, and quality of life in patients who had irradiated brain tumors.
All participants received 5 mg/day of donepezil for 6 weeks, then 10 mg/day of donepezil for 18 weeks, followed by a washout period of 6 weeks where no treatment was administered.
This was a prospective, open-label, phase II study.
Significant improvement was noted between the pre-treatment baseline and week 24 on measures of attention/concentration, verbal memory, figural memory, and a trend for verbal fluency (all p < 0.05). Confused mood was also improved from baseline to 24 weeks (p = 0.03). Health-related quality of life improved from baseline to 24 weeks in brain-specific concerns (p = 0.003), emotional functioning (p = 0.04), and social functioning (p = 0.02), with a trend for improvement in total health-related quality of life (p = 0.07).
Ten of 21 participants, or 48% of those who completed the study through the 30-week assessment, chose to go back on donepezil. A total of 63 toxicities ranging from grade 1 to grade 3 were reported.
Mood, health-related quality of life, and cognitive functioning (attention/concentration, verbal memory, and figural memory) were significantly improved following a 24-week course of donepezil.
Shaw, J.M., Young, J.M., Butow, P.N., Badgery-Parker, T., Durcinoska, I., Harrison, J.D., . . . Solomon, M.J. (2015). Improving psychosocial outcomes for caregivers of people with poor prognosis gastrointestinal cancers: A randomized controlled trial (Family Connect). Supportive Care in Cancer, 24, 585–595.
To assess the effectiveness of an intervention using structured telephone interventions for the caregivers of patients diagnosed with gastrointestinal cancer that had a poor prognosis to improve psychosocial outcomes of the patient and caregiver
This intervention was a randomized, controlled trial in which caregivers were assigned to either the family connect (FC) telephone intervention or usual care. The FC group received four standardized telephone calls in the 10 weeks after patient hospital discharge. The caregivers’ quality of life, caregiver burden, unmet supportive needs, and distress were assessed at three and six months.
This study was a parallel-randomized trial with a 1:1 group allocation.
Caregiver QOL scores were similar in both groups. The group that was randomized to receive the intervention reported a greater sense of social support and reduced worry about finances, and they also had fewer rehospitalization and emergency department visits.
This intervention did not demonstrate significant improvements in quality of life or sense of well-being for the caregivers. There were some trends observed through data analysis, which warranted the continued development of meaningful, telephone-based, caregiver-focused supportive care interventions.
This study did demonstrate the potential to improve patient and caregiver QOL. Future nursing research should focus on continuing to educate caregivers with strategies to identify and address patient care needs, which can ultimately reduce the overall cost to healthcare systems.
Sharp, L., Cotton, S., Gray, N., Avis, M., Russell, I., Walker, L., . . . TOMBOLA Group. (2011). Long-term psychosocial impact of alternative management policies in women with low-grade abnormal cervical cytology referred for colposcopy: A randomised controlled trial. British Journal of Cancer, 104, 255-264.
To compare the psychosocial outcomes of two different approaches for management of women undergoing colposcopy: immediate large loop excision versus punch biopsies with recall
In a larger study, women had been randomly assigned to cytological surveillance or colposcopy for low-grade abnormal cervical cytology. Women having colposcopy then were randomly assigned to either immediate large loop excision or to a group having punch biopsies and selective recall. Assessments were done at baseline, at six weeks post-procedure, and at 12,18, 24, and 30 months.
PHASE OF CARE: Diagnostic
Randomized controlled trial
There were no differences between groups in prevalence of significant depression at any study time-point. In all patients, the median POMS score fell significantly from recruitment to 12 months (p < .001) and remained stable thereafter. There were no significant differences in average scores at any time-point. In all patients, anxiety fell significantly from baseline to six weeks post-procedure (p < .001) and remained stable thereafter. There were no significant differences between groups at any time point in the study.
There were no differences in symptoms of anxiety and depression based on the type of management examined here for women undergoing colposcopy. In all patients, anxiety and depression declined significantly shortly after the procedure and then remained stable over the next 24 months. However, the prevalence of significant depression (HADS depression subscale ≥ 8 ) increased from 6% precolcoscopy to 9.6% at 30 months.
Findings suggest that the specific approach to management with colposcopy does not significantly impact anxiety and depression in women with low-risk abnormal cervical cytology. The timing of depression increase seen here might suggest that extended follow-up after colposcopy and treatment may be associated with depression for some women. Which of the strategies examined here offers the best balance between benefits and harms is a matter of continuing debate.
Sharplin, G.R., Jones, S.B., Hancock, B., Knott, V.E., Bowden, J.A., & Whitford, H.S. (2010). Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy: An efficacious community-based group intervention for depression and anxiety in a sample of cancer patients. Medical Journal of Australia, 193(5 Suppl.), S79–82.
To assess the impact of an eight-week mindfulness-based cognitive therapy program on individuals experiencing distress as a consequence of cancer
Participants included people with a history of cancer and those the study defined as carers. Participants were people who called the Cancer Council South Australia Helpline. They were assessed for anxiety and depression before and after a course of mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT). The MBCT program consisted of eight weekly two-hour sessions facilitated by an experienced counselor. The program sessions included these topics: stepping out of automatic pilot; dealing with barriers; mindfulness of one’s breath; staying present; acceptance; holding, allowing, letting be; thoughts are not facts; how to best take care of oneself; and using learned skills to control future mood. An optional three-hour follow-up session occurred six weeks after program completion, to reinforce mindfulness principles.
Prospective, one-group, pre/post-test design
Poor study design and small sample prevent drawing a valid conclustion about the effect of the intervention.
MBCT may be an effective intervention for cancer survivors and carers who are willing to make a time commitment for sessions and homework. Further research is warranted.
Sharpe, M., Walker, J., Holm Hansen, C., Martin, P., Symeonides, S., Gourley, C., . . . Murray, G. (2014). Integrated collaborative care for comorbid major depression in patients with cancer (SMaRT Oncology-2): A multicentre randomised controlled effectiveness trial. Lancet, 384, 1099–1108.
To compare the effectiveness of an integrated treatment program for major depression in patients with cancer with usual care
This study enrolled patients with major depression from three cancer centers. Patients were randomly assigned in a one-to-one ratio to either the standard care for depression or an intervention group. The intervention consisted of a multicomponent treatment program. This collaborative care model was expanded to include integration with the patients' specialist medical care. Potential participants were identified by the depression screening offered to all patients attending the selected National Health Service clinics in Scotland. A database software program randomized participants to the standard care or intervention groups. In the standard care group, the primary care physician and oncologist were informed of the diagnosis of major depression and asked to treat their patient accordingly. In the intervention group, the physicians were informed of the diagnosis and the participant saw a specially trained nurse under the supervision of a psychiatrist. This program was an intensive, collaborative care-based program specifically designed to be integrated with the patient’s cancer treatment.
Randomized, controlled trial comparing a standard treatment and an intervention
From 2008 to 2011, 253 patients were placed into the intervention group and 247 were placed in the standard of care group. Baseline characteristics did not differ between groups. Rates of antidepressant prescriptions at minimum effective doses and dose adjustments were higher in the intervention group. Very few patients from either group received formal psychological treatment from mental health professionals. The primary outcome of treatment response was achieved by 62% of patients in the intervention group compared to 17% of patients in the standard care group. The odds ratio was eight to five (95% confidence interval, p < .0001). The intervention was better than standard care for all secondary and tertiary outcomes. The mean additional cost per patient of providing depression care was in the 95% confidence interval.
A statistically significant number of patients had a clinical response in the intervention group versus the standard of care. This group also had a much greater improvement in anxiety, pain, fatigue, functional ability, quality of life, and perceived quality of care.
Nurses are able to play a major role in screening for depression and are able to provide (with training) interventions to help patients improve the symptoms of depression. Nurses also can provide longitudinal follow-up in assessing the improvement of depression. Attention to and treatment of depression in patients with cancer is effective. Nurses can advocate for sufficient attention to depression screening and management.
Sharp, L., Finnilä, K., Johansson, H., Abrahamsson, M., Hatschek, T., & Bergenmar, M. (2013). No differences between Calendula cream and aqueous cream in the prevention of acute radiation skin reactions – Results from a randomised blinded trial. European Journal of Oncology Nursing, 17, 429–435.
To compare two topical agents (Calendula Weleda® cream and Essex® cream) in reducing the risk of severe acute radiation skin reactions in women receiving adjuvant radiation therapy for breast cancer
Patients randomly were assigned one of two creams (Calendula or Essex) and applied a thin layer twice daily from the beginning of radiotherapy through two weeks after their final radiation treatment or until the skin reaction healed. The cream was not applied within two hours of the radiation treatment. Patients were advised to wash daily with nonperfumed soap and told not to apply other topicals in the radiation field. Patients completed questionnaires related to quality of life (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer [EORTC]-QLQ C30), sleep (MOS), and symptoms (e.g., pain, tenderness, burning, pulling, itching) related to the radiation field on a visual analog scale.
Researchers found no statistically significant difference in severe acute radiation skin reactions in the group using Calendula cream versus the group using Essex cream (a water-based topical emollient, which is the standard of care in that institution.) Severe acute radiation skin reaction (RTOG/EORTC grade less than or equal to 2) was 23% in the Calendula group versus 19% in the Essex group. There were no differences in patient-reported outcomes in terms of pain, burning, itching, pulling, or tenderness at the radiation site. However, there was a statistically significant difference in patient evaluation of application and absorption of the cream in favor of Essex cream.
There was no difference in severe acute radiation skin reactions in women with breast cancer using Calendula cream or Essex cream during radiation therapy.
Patients with breast cancer undergoing curative radiation therapy may experience a less severe acute radiation skin reaction using twice daily application of Calendula cream or an aqueous-based cream. Future studies could include patients with other types of cancer and different treatment fields to compare benefits of these topical emollients.
Sharp, D.M., Walker, M.B., Chaturvedi, A., Upadhyay, S., Hamid, A., Walker, A.A., … Walker, L.G. (2010). A randomised, controlled trial of the psychological effects of reflexology in early breast cancer. European Journal of Cancer, 46, 312–322.
To evaluate the effects of reflexology compared to the effects of massage or usual care on the cancer-related quality of life, relaxation, mood, and adjustment of women with newly diagnosed early breast cancer
Women were randomized to one of three interventions: reflexology plus self-initiated support (SIS), scalp massage plus SIS, or SIS (treatment-as-usual control group). Patients receiving reflexology or massage received eight one-hour sessions at weekly intervals for eight weeks, beginning seven weeks after surgery. Patients were assessed by a nurse who was blinded to treatment allocation. Assessments occurred before randomization (week 6 after surgery), 18 weeks after surgery, and 24 weeks after surgery.
Phase of care: active treatment
Randomized controlled clinical trial
At the two end points, authors noted no significant differences in depression scores. This indicated that neither intervention had any impact on depression or anxiety.
Findings do not support the effectiveness of reflexology as a means of reducing depression or anxiety.