Musarezaie, A., Moeini, M., Taleghani, F., & Mehrabi, T. (2014). Does spiritual care program affect levels of depression in patients with Leukemia? A randomized clinical trial. Journal of Education and Health Promotion, 3, 96-9531.139678.
To determine the effects of a spiritual care and support program on levels of depression in patients with leukemia
Patients in intensive care randomly were assigned to the spiritual care or control groups. Patients in the control group could receive the spiritual care program after the completion of the study. The program encouraged a supportive presence through the expression of feelings, needs, and concerns, and provided education regarding disease, treatment, and supportive touch. To support religious rituals, patients were provided a prayer rug, rosary, and a veil for women. Participants also had access to an MP3 player and earphones to listen to prayers and passages from the Quran. Readings of prayers and the Quran at the bedside were implemented by a clergyman. Study measures were obtained at baseline and on day 3 by an individual blinded to study group assignment.
Single-blinded, randomized, controlled trial
The mean postintervention score in the experimental group was lower than that of the control group (p < .001), and the change in depression scores in the intervention group was marginally significant (p < .07). Baseline data and changes for both groups were not provided.
This intervention, which included support and psychoeducational components along with spiritual support, was associated with reduced depression scores.
Supportive and psychoeducational interventions that include a component of spiritual support may be beneficial for hospitalized patients with leukemia. The provision of holistic supportive care is a principle of nursing care. These findings provide marginal support for the efficacy of these interventions during short-term hospitalization. There were several study limitations.
Musani, A.I., Haas, A.R., Seijo, L., Wilby, M., & Sterman, D.H. (2004). Outpatient management of malignant pleural effusions with small-bore, tunneled pleural catheters. Respiration; International Review of Thoracic Diseases, 71(6), 559-566.
The objective of the study was to retrospectively examine whether recurrent malignant pleural effusions (MPEs) could be managed on an outpatient basis using small-bore tunneled pleural catheters (PCs) and without the use of sclerosing agents.
The study was a retrospective analysis of 24 patients who underwent placement of PCs to manage recurrent dyspnea symptoms due to MPEs.
Patients chosen were experiencing symptomatic MPEs and
PC placement took place in an outpatient clinic under local anesthesia or conscious sedation. Written and oral instructions were given to the patients and caregivers, including details on how to care for the catheter and perform drainage at home. Patients and their caregivers also received home visits from a home health nurse to reinforce these instructions. Patients were evaluated in the outpatient center weekly for the first two weeks and then as needed clinically. In each post-placement visit, patients were evaluated for subjective findings such as dyspnea, chest discomfort, and exercise intolerance. Objective evaluations included pulse oximetry, blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate, and weight measurement. In addition, patients were evaluated for pulmonary and/or catheter complications, including chest radiographs and computed tomography scans (if indicated).
Once the PC output was less than 50 mL on three consecutive days, the PC was removed using only local anesthesia in the Pulmonary Outpatient Center, and patients were periodically followed by the Interventional Pulmonology outpatient practice for evaluation of symptom recurrence or effusion.
This single-site study was conducted in an outpatient clinic in Philadelphia, PA, for both insertion and removal of the PC catheter.
The study was a retrospective chart analysis.
The dyspnea assessment instrument was not identified, but the presence and absence of dyspnea was implied.
A total of 27 PCs were placed. Three patients had bilateral PC placement, and one patient had two ipsilateral catheter placements (accounting for the extra catheter placements). All catheters were placed in an outpatient setting, and patients were sent home on the same day without any immediate complications. Five patients died during the study; four of these patients had fully functioning and patent catheters. The fifth patient developed cardiac tamponade, and the PC was removed and replaced by a chest tube. The indwelling time for these five patients prior to passing was 26.3 days.
Complications related to catheter placement included cellulitis, bacterial super-infection, and incisional tumor growth. These complications were managed with antibiotics, removal of the PC, and increases in anti-neoplastic medication.
Nineteen patients survived to catheter removal or to the time the analysis took place. Out of the 19 patients, 10 patients reached spontaneous pleurodesis after using daily PC drainage over a median time of 39 days. One patient achieved pleurodesis in 15 days after PC placement for a total of 11 out of 19 (58%) patients achieving either complete or partial pleurodesis without chest tubes or the use of sclerosing agents.
Small-bore tunneled pleural catheters are offered as an alternative, more palliative, less invasive treatment for MPEs. The number of patients in this study that reported relief of dyspnea symptoms and were able to achieve complete or partial pleurodesis after PC placement is comparable to those who undergo more invasive procedures.
The outpatient small-bore tunneled catheter method does not seem to be an appropriate method for patients with recurrent, symptomatic MPEs who have weeks or days to live.
Murphy, G.R., Glass, G.E., & Jain, A. (2016). The efficacy and safety of tranexamic acid in cranio-maxillofacial and plastic surgery. The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, 27, 374–379.
STUDY PURPOSE: To evaluate the current literature related to the efficacy and safety of tranexamic acid in craniomaxillofacial, head and neck, breast, aesthetic, burns, and plastic surgery
PHASE OF CARE: Active antitumor treatment
APPLICATIONS: Pediatrics
In the craniofacial studies, tranexamic acid use led to reduced blood loss (p = 0.00001) and a reduction in transfusion requirements (p = 0.00001). In the orthognathic studies, tranexamic acid use led to reduced blood loss (p = 0.01). In the head and neck trial, tranexamic acid led to a reduction in mean volume of drainage (p = 0.041). In the breast trial, tranexamic acid led to a reduction in drainage volume (p < 0.001). No complications were reported with the use of tranexamic acid in any of the included trials.
Tranexamic acid reduces blood loss and reduces the need for blood transfusions in craniofacial surgery. It reduces blood loss in orthognathic surgery and may reduce the drainage volumes in head and neck and breast surgeries.
Nurses involved in the surgical management of patients with cancer could consider the benefits of tranexamic acid in reducing drainage volumes in patients with head and neck or breast cancer. However, the articles did not draw clear correlations with the type of surgery and the presence of cancer. No significant finding was reported in these two populations related to the prevention of bleeding during or following surgical procedures.
Murphy, J., Stacey, D., Crook, J., Thompson, B., & Panetta, D. (2000). Testing control of radiation-induced diarrhea with a psyllium bulking agent: A pilot study. Canadian Oncology Nursing Journal, 10(3), 96–100.
To study the effectiveness of psyllium fiber (Metamucil®) taken during pelvic radiation treatment for prostate or gynecological cancer
The experimental group received 1–2 teaspoons psyllium fiber. The control group did not receive any psyllium fiber. Patients in both groups were given a booklet titled “Nutritional Guidelines to Help Control Diarrhea.” Patients kept diaries from day 1 of recruitment through 28 days post-treatment, recording the number of bowel movements per day, consistency of stools, amount of antidiarrhea medication taken, and daily dose of psyllium fiber (for the experimental group).
This was a nonblinded, randomized controlled trial.
Psyllium fiber is a well-tolerated, low-cost, effective intervention for reducing the incidence and severity of radiation-induced diarrhea in patients undergoing pelvic radiation treatment for prostate or gynecologic cancer.
Murakami, M., Hashimoto, H., Yamaguchi, K., Yamaguchi, I., Senba, S., & Siraishi, T. (2013). Effectiveness of palonosetron for preventing delayed chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting following moderately emetogenic chemotherapy in patients with gastrointestinal cancer. Supportive Care in Cancer, 22(4), 905–909.
To determine the effectiveness of palonosetron when compared to granisetron in controlling nausea and vomiting in people with gastrointestinal cancer who were receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy
Patients with gastrointestinal cancer receiving their initial dose of induction chemotherapy (moderately emetogenic) either received 3 mg of granisetron or 0.75 mg of palonosetron on day 1 of treatment in addition to standard treatment (6.6 mg IV dexamethasone on day 1 and 8 mg oral dexamethasone on days 2 and 3). Effectiveness of the antiemetics was evaluated on day 5 by comparing occurrence of acute and delayed nausea and vomiting between the two groups.
Prospective observational design, no random assignment of conditions, and no blinding of conditions
The Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer's (MASCC's) Antiemesis Tool (MAT) with additional items about anorexia added. The MAT contains eight items assessing acute and delayed nausea and vomiting and one item assessing anorexia. Participants were asked to complete this measure five days after receiving chemotherapy.
Overall nausea and delayed nausea were significantly lower in the palonosetron group as compared to the granisetron group (p < 0.01). The differences between acute nausea, overall vomiting, delayed vomiting, and acute vomiting were not statistically significant.
Palonosetron effectively controls delayed nausea caused by moderately emetogenic chemotherapy as compared to granisetron in patients with gastrointestinal cancer.
Palonosetron appears to be effective in controlling delayed nausea and would be a useful antiemetic to prescribe for those receiving regimens consisting of moderately emetogenic chemotherapy.
Munoz Langa, J., Gascon, P., de Castro, J., & the Spanish Society of Clinical Oncology. (2012). SEOM clinical guidelines for myeloid growth factors. Clinical and Translational Oncology, 14, 491–498.
The purpose of the study was to facilitate practice based on clinical evidence by establishing practice guidelines on the use of myeloid growth factors. Adults in hematology and oncology were studied.
The resource type was evidence-based guideline. The process of development included a review of the meta-analysis, systematic Cochrane review, and a review of several randomized clinical trials.
The Cochrane database was reviewed. Keywords included neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, myeloid growth factors, G-CSF, clinical practice guidelines, filgrastim, and pegfilgrastim
Active antitumor treatment
This article did not discuss the specific evidence, but outlined benefits of treatment with colony-stimulating factor (CSF) and its use in chemotherapy regimens. Distinguished use as secondary or therapeutic and reviewed the different types of CSFs to be used with which tumor types. The volume of citations was 35.
The use of CSF for primary prophylaxis should be based on the risk of an episode of febrile neutropenia based on disease and chemotherapy regimen. Chemotherapy regimens with risk of febrile neutropenia greater than 20% of primary prophylaxis with CSF is recommended; 10%–20% febrile neutropenia CSF should be considered and less than 10% risk CSF is not recommended. Secondary prophylaxis following an episode of febrile neutropenia or dose-limiting neutropenia, CSF should be considered if not given previously or in cases in which a reduction or delay of the dose is associated with poor prognosis. Therapeutic use when patients present with febrile neutropenia is recommended based on the existing risk factors for poor clinical outcomes or for developing infection-associated complications.
Risk factors are older than age 65 years, sepsis syndrome, severe neutropenia, absolute neutrophil count (ANC) less than 100 mcl or prolonged duration of more than 10 days, pneumonia, invasive fungal infection or other clinically documented infections, hospitalization at time of fever, and prior episode of febrile neutropenia.
Provides professional evidence-based guidelines for use of CSFs for prophylaxis and treatment of febrile neutropenia. Recommendations here are consistent with those of past versions, and are consistent with those of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network and other relevant professional groups.
Mukhopadhyay, S., Kwatra, G., Pamela, A.K., & Badyal, D. (2017). Role of olanzapine in chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting on platinum-based chemotherapy patients: A randomized controlled study. Supportive Care in Cancer, 25, 145–154.
To evaluate the efficacy of olanzapine in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) in patients receiving platinum-based chemotherapy and prophylactic palonosetron and dexamethasone
This was a randomized, controlled, assessor-blind study.
Patients recorded the frequency and time of emetic episodes and the frequency and time of rescue antiemetics for the first five days. Patients also used the Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) Antiemesis Tool (MAT) to record the control of nausea and vomiting and intensity of symptoms from days 1–5. Patients also recorded any adverse effects on days 1, 3, and 8–10 and as needed, as well as the duration and severity of the adverse effect. A trained nurse assessed all patients between day 8–10. At this time, the patients' overall quality of life was assessed using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life (EORTC QLQ-C30), version 3, questionnaire.
For patients receiving platinum-based chemotherapy, olanzapine is an effective addition for the prevention of CINV. The only side effect listed is more sedation.
Findings not generalizable
Olanazpine is effective for the prevention of CINV in this sample with few adverse effects. It may not be generalizable, but more studies are supporting its use.
Mueller-Lissner, S., Kamm, M.A., Wald, A., Hinkel, U., Koehler, U., Richter, E., & Bubeck, J. (2010). Multicenter, 4-week, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of sodium picosulfate in patients with chronic constipation. American Journal of Gastroenterology, 105, 897–903.
To evaluate the effectiveness of sodium picosulfate for constipation.
Patients were randomized to receive either sodium picosulfate or matching placebo drops as treatment. If the study treatment was not effective, 10 mg bisacodyl was used as rescue medication. Patients were allowed to titrate the number of study drug drops to best meet their bowel function needs.
This was a double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, randomized clinical trial.
The use of laxative with sodium picosulfate in patients with chronic constipation may improve complete spontaneous BMs.
Nurses need to be aware of other agents for the treatment of constipation, as well as the pharmacodynamics in which these agents work.
Mousset, S., Hermann, S., Klein, S. A., Bialleck, H., Duchscherer, M., Bomke, B., . . . Martin, H. (2005). Prophylactic and interventional granulocyte transfusions in patients with haematological malignancies and life-threatening infections during neutropenia. Annals of Hematology, 84, 734–741.
To describe one organization’s experience and findings with the use of prophylactic and interventional granulocyte infusions.
Two different approaches with granulocyte transfusions were used: (1) as an intervention for patients with progressive life-threatening infections and (2) to prevent the recurrence of infections in patients at high risk, including those undergoing allogeneic peripheral stem cell transplant. Patients receiving prophylactic treatment were scheduled for granulocyte transfusion from the beginning of neutropenia in the treatment cycle. As an intervention, transfusions were given to patients with an absolute neutrophil count (ANC) less than 100/mm3 if they had a life-threatening infection despite other prophylactic antimicrobial treatment or severe infections during a previous neturopenic period, with a high risk of recurrence. Timing and frequency of granulocyte transfusions were not described, but it was stated that transfusions were stopped if the ANC was greater than 500/mm3 48 hours after the last transfusion. Outcomes were evaluated 30 days after the first transfusion.
Patients were undergoing the active antitumor treatment phase of care.
This was a descriptive observational study.
European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) criteria for the classification of fungal infections
This study described the use of granulocyte transfusions and findings between prophylactic and interventional use related to fungal infections.
* Results reporting provides individual case details but little analysis of results and only analysis of difference between prophylactic use and interventional use in a small subset of patients who developed fungal infections. There was no information regarding antifungal prophylaxis or other aspects of care that can be expected to affect these outcomes. Reporting of percentages varied between the sample percent, cycles, or episodes of transfusion. Many of the cases reported as fungal infection were actually possible rather than actual according to the EORTC criteria used. There was no subgroup analysis between various sample groups with different infection risks.
This study provided minimal information; it described an experience in using granulocyte transfusions.
Moukharskaya, J., Abrams, D.M., Ashikaga, T., Khan, F., Schwartz, J., Wilson, K., . . . Ades, S. (2016). Randomized phase II study of loratadine for the prevention of bone pain caused by pegfilgrastim. Supportive Care in Cancer, 24, 3085–3093.
To investigate the effects of prophylactic antihistamine on colony-stimulating factor(CSF)–related bone pain
The study included observation and treatment phases. Patients receiving pegfilgrastim completed pain surveys during the observation phase. Patients who developed significant pain were randomized to loratadine 10 mg daily or a matched placebo for seven days beginning on the day of pegfilgrastim administration. Rescue analgesics were recorded. Bone pain was assessed at baseline and on day 8 during both study phases.
Significant bone pain occurred in 30.5% of patients and worst pain score increased on average from 1.6 to 3.6 during the eight days following pegfilgrastim (p < 0.001). Patients receiving taxanes were more likely to develop significant pain (50.8% versus 23%, p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in baseline pain scores or change in pain scores between study groups. There were no significant differences between groups in analgesic use. Among patients receiving taxane, 90% benefited from loratadine, compared to 27.3% in the placebo arm (p = 0.0008). Both study groups receiving taxanes showed increased worst pains scores from baseline.
In the total sample, antihistamine prophylaxis did not demonstrate a benefit for prevention of CSF-induced bone pain. Findings suggest that there may be some effects for patients receiving taxanes; however, the sample size is too small to draw firm conclusions.
This study did not show any benefit of antihistamine for prevention of CSF-related bone pain. Findings suggest that further research in this area is needed, and specific examination of any benefits in patients receiving taxanes should be further investigated.