Park, H., Parker, G. L., Boardman, C. H., Morris, M. M., & Smith, T. J. (2011). A pilot phase II trial of magnesium supplements to reduce menopausal hot flashes in breast cancer patients. Supportive Care in Cancer, 19(6), 859-863.
The study tested whether magnesium would diminish bothersome hot flashes in breast cancer patients
Patients were assessed at baseline for all variables. They recieved magnesium 400 mg daily for 2 weeks. If symptom relief on hot flashes was seen, they stayed with same dose for 2 weeks more. If not, they increased to 400 mg twice daily for 2 weeks.
Twenty-nine women with a mean age of 53.5 years were enrolled. All were breast cancer patients with ECOG Performance status 0-1 & 2. Patients were excluded if they:
Excluded Renal
This was an observational study.
Instruments and assessments included.
Hot flash frequency and score were reduced with magnesium. The average weekly hot flash score decreased by 50.4% from 109.8 (SE, 40.9) to 47.8 (SE, 13.8), p value 0.02. Magnesium does not have effect on overall quality of life. Fatigue and distress due to hot flashes showed modest benefit. Minor side-effects included migraine, headache, and nausea.
The findings suggest that oral magnesium supplementation is effective in reducing the severity and frequency of hot flashes in women after treatment for breast cancer
This study used a small sample <30. The study design was not controlled or randomized. There was possible variance in grading side-effects or toxicity. Magnesium should be tested in a larger population
Magnesium may safely decrease hot flashes, with few side effects and low cost. Further research in use of magnesium supplements is warranted.
Park, H.Y., Lee, B.J., Kim, J.H., Bae, J.N., & Hahm, B.J. (2012). Rapid improvement of depression and quality of life with escitalopram treatment in outpatients with breast cancer: A 12-week, open-label prospective trial. Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry, 36, 318–323.
To investigate the effectiveness and tolerability of open-label treatment with escitalopram in patients with breast cancer who have major depressive disorder
Patients received escitalopram at 5 mg/day in week 1. After week 1, the dose was adjusted to 5–20 mg/day. Patients were evaluated at baseline, 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12 weeks.
Outpatient settings in the Republic of Korea
Transition phase after initial treatment
Prospective study
62 patients were included in the efficacy analysis, and only 45.6% completed the full 12-week study. Dropouts occurred because of lack of efficacy, no symptom improvement, side effects, and unspecified reasons. 34% of the sample dropped out due to lack of effectiveness or no change in symptoms.
Significant decreases were seen at week 1 and forward in HAMD (p < 0.001), DT (p < 0.001), and CGI-S (p < 0.003). FACT-B scores improved after week 2 (p = 0.011). No differences were observed in baseline scores between responders and nonresponders.
No serious adverse events were reported. The most common side effects were dry mouth, drowsiness, constipation, and increased sweating. Sleep disturbance, shortness of breath, and sadness were improved, but pain, fatigue, and anorexia did not improve.
Escitalopram reduced depression in some patients with breast cancer who had major depressive disorder.
Escitalopram may be an effective treatment for symptoms of depression in some patients with breast cancer; however, about a third of patients in the study did not experience an effect. Nurses should be aware of side effects that may worsen existing symptoms.
Park, R., & Park, C. (2015). Comparison of foot bathing and foot massage in chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy. Cancer Nursing, 38, 239–247.
To assess the effects of foot bathing and foot massage for chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy
Patients receiving taxane- or platinum-based chemotherapy were alternately assigned to receive foot baths or foot massage. Both interventions were performed for 30 minutes three times every other day during the patients' hospital stay and five additional times in the home. When at home, phone calls were made to encourage compliance with the intervention. Primary caregivers were instructed in procedures. Study assessments were conducted after the first and eighth treatments. A water temperature of 40 degrees centigrade was used for foot baths.
PHASE OF CARE: Active antitumor treatment
Two-group, prospective trial
Foot skin temperature increased about 2 degrees in patients receiving the foot baths and increased less than 1 degree in those receiving foot massage (p = 0.001). There was no significant difference between the groups in grade of sensory neurotoxicity. Those receiving the foot bath reported improved emotional and functional well-being (p < 0.02).
Neither foot baths nor foot massage resulted in improvement in sensory neurotoxicity scores. Those receiving foot baths had increased skin temperature immediately after the intervention and reported improved well-being.
Foot baths and foot massage did not demonstrate results in improvement in sensory symptoms in this study. Patients may experience an improved sense of well-being with foot baths.
Park, J.H., Min, Y.S., Chun, S.M., & Seo, K.S. (2015). Effects of stellate ganglion block on breast cancer-related lymphedema: Comparison of various injectates. Pain Physician, 18, 93–99.
To evaluate the effects of a stellate ganglion block (SGB) and steroids on breast cancer-related lymphedema
Patients were randomly assigned to one of three groups using different substances injected for SGB, (1) bupivacaine alone, (2) bupivacaine and triamcinolone, or (3) triamcinolone alone. Patients were given three consecutive blocks every two weeks. Outcome measurements were obtained at two, four, and eight weeks.
Double-blinded, randomized, controlled study
Forearm circumference was significantly decreased in all groups one month after three treatments. Upper arm measures showed significant reductions at different time points across the three groups, but all showed a statistically significant reduction over time (p < 0.017). Those who received SGB with triamcinolone had a slightly larger reduction in upper arm circumference. There were no differences between groups in quality of life measures.
SGBs may be a viable alternative treatment for breast cancer-related arm lymphedema. The use of a corticosteroid for the block might produce the most effective results.
SGBs may be an effective alternative treatment for breast cancer-related lymphedema. Additional research is needed to confirm these findings.
Park, K.H., Lee, S., Park, J.H., Kang, S.Y., Kim, H.Y., Park, I.H., . . . Seo, J.H. (2017). A randomized, multi-center, open-label, phase III study of once-per-cycle DA-3031, a pegylated G-CSF, in comparison with daily filgrastim in patients receiving TAC chemotherapy for breast cancer. Supportive Care in Cancer, 25, 505–511.
To demonstrate that DA-3031 is not inferior to daily filgrastim to manage neutropenia
Patients were randomly assigned to receive daily filgrastim or DA-3031. Daily filgrastim at 100mcg/m2 began 24 hours after chemotherapy was started and continued until absolute neutrophil count was at least 5 x 109, or for 10 days. Those in the experimental group received 6 mg DA-3031 by subcutaneous injection on day 2 of each chemotherapy cycle. Patients received TAC chemotherapy every three weeks up to six cycles. The noninferiority margin set was two days for the duration of grade 4 neutropenia.
PHASE OF CARE: Active antitumor treatment
Open-label, noninferiority, randomized, controlled trial
Mean duration of grade 4 neutropenia was 2.08 (SD = 0.85) days for the filgrastim group and 2.28 (SD = 1.14) days for the DA-3031 group. The difference between groups was 0.2 (SD = 1) days, supporting noninferiority of DA-3031. There were no significant differences between groups in absolute neutrophil coutn recovery time, incidence of febrile neutropenia, hospitalization, or requirement for intravenous antibiotics. There was no significant difference between groups in musculoskeletal symptoms associated with colony-stimulating factor administration. The findings were similar across all chemotherapy cycles. ITT and per protocol analysis were similar.
DA-3031, a once-per-cycle colony-stimulating factor, was not inferior to daily filgrastim.
DA-3031, a pegylated colony-stimulating factor was comparable to daily pegfilgrastim for neutropenia-related outcomes among women receiving TAC therapy. A once-per-cycle colony-stimulating factor can be more practical for patients because it does not require daily injections. Comparative costs of these two approaches was not discussed and may need to be considered in the selection of an approach.
Park, K.H., Sohn, J.H., Lee, S., Park, J.H., Kang, S.Y., Kim, H.Y., . . . Seo, J.H. (2013). A randomized, multi-center, open-label, phase II study of once-per-cycle DA-3031, a biosimilar pegylated G-CSF, compared with daily filgrastim in patients receiving TAC chemotherapy for early-stage breast cancer. Investigational New Drugs, 31, 1300–1306.
To evaluate the safety and efficacy of once-per-cycle DA-3031 in patients receiving chemotherapy for breast cancer
Patients were randomized to daily injections of filgrastim 100 mcg/m2 beginning 24 hours after chemotherapy until absolute neutrophil count (ANC) was 5x109 after nadir or up to 10 days, or to one of two doses of pegfilgrastim (3.6 mg or 6 mg). The primary endpoint was duration of grade 4 neutropenia.
No significant differences were seen among groups in ANC nadirs or time to recovery. Overall incidence of febrile neutropenia was 9.8%, with no significant differences between groups. The most common adverse event was musculoskeletal pain, with no significant differences between groups, although pain was slightly higher in the 6 mg pegfilgrastim group.
Single-dose pegfilgrastim had similar efficacy and side effects to daily filgrastim.
Daily dosing of filgrastim had essentially the same efficacy and side effects as once-per-cycle pegfilgrastim. Severity of musculoskeletal pain appeared to be slightly higher with the higher dose of pegfilgrastim. Reducing the need for daily injections may be an important consideration for some patients and has been shown to have essentially the same effects. Higher doses may be associated with increased musculoskeletal pain. Although not statistically significant, this can be an important consideration to promote patient quality of care.
Pardo Masferrer, J., Murcia Mejía, M., Vidal Fernández, M., Alvarado Astudillo, A., Hernández Armenteros, M. L., Macías Hernández, V., . . . Mirada Ferre, A. (2010). Prophylaxis with a cream containing urea reduces the incidence and severity of radio-induced dermatitis. Clinical and Translational Oncology, 12, 43–48.
Primary Aim: To evaluate the effectiveness of author-defined intensive use (three times daily [TID] use starting two or three weeks before radiotherapy [RT] and continuing this frequency throughout RT) application of a lotion preparation made of 3% urea, polidocanol, and hyaluronic acid for preventing the appearance of acute radiodermatitis and controlling its severity in patients actively undergoing RT for breast cancer.
Secondary Aim: To study effectiveness, the authors compared the incidence and grade of toxicity with 174 patients with breast cancer treated in the same clinic the previous year. These patients used skin-support measures at the beginning of RT or when radiodermatitis occurred.
Ureadin cream was used TID for two to three weeks prior to the start of external beam RT (EBRT) and continued for the entire treatment period. This use was considered intensive compared to other studies and the standard use schedule of twice daily (BID) cream application at the start of RT or 10 days before starting RT.
This was a prospective, observational study performed over 14 months.
The overall rate of radiodermatitis was 72.4%, with 51% of patients being toxicity grade 1; 20% grade 2, and 1% grade 3. The first case of skin toxicity appeared in third week of treatment; in >87% of patients, radiodermatitis appeared between weeks 5 and 7. The severity of radiodermatitis with the intensive use of the lotion was significantly lower (72.4% vs. 84.5%; p < 0.05). The grade of toxicity was significantly lower in intensive-use patients (p < 0.001), and grade 2 toxicity or higher was significantly lower (21.4% vs. 50%; p < 0.01). Severity of clinical symptoms of pain, itching, redness, desquamation, and impact on QOL was reported as negligible by patients.
For patients with breast cancer who undergo conservative surgery and will receive RT to a dose of 60 to 70 Gy, use of Ureadin on an intensive basis (TID beginning two to three weeks prior to the start of RT) compared to BID use is considered effective at reducing the incidence and grade of skin toxicity during RT and is well tolerated by patients.
Paramanandam, V.S., & Roberts, D. (2014). Weight training is not harmful for women with breast cancer-related lymphoedema: A systematic review. Journal of Physiotherapy, 60, 136–143.
PHASE OF CARE: Late effects and survivorship
APPLICATIONS: Elder care
Weight training exercise with low to moderate intensity (no trials used high-intensity weight training) and relatively slow progression significantly improved upper limb strength (SMD = 0.93, 95% CI 0.73–1.12) and lower limb strength (SMD = 0.75, 95% CI 0.47–1.04) without increasing arm volume or the incidence of breast cancer-related lymphedema. No significant effects were noted for body mass index (SMD = -0.10, 95% -0.31–0.11). Some aspects of quality of life may have improved with weight training. Participants in all trials used pressure garments and received supervision.
Weight training appeared to be safe and beneficial in improving limb strength and the physical components of quality of life in women with or at risk of lymphedema. Pressure garments, supervision, and limiting the intensity of the weight training may be important, but this could not be confirmed with this review.
A potential selection bias of the studies reviewed may exist because no blinding methods were employed among authors and affiliations. Heterogeneity among the studies reviewed limited the scope of the statistical analysis, so a narrative synthesis and meta-analysis were conducted. Heterogeneity may also limit the generalizability of the overall study results.
This review indicated that low-intensity exercise was recommended to protect the arm from adverse events. However, supervision and compression garments were featured in the reviewed studies, and their impact and effectiveness need to be confirmed. In addition, no evidence was available to suggest that high-intensity weight training was harmful to the arm. Research efforts need to be made in this area.
Paramanandam, V.S., & Dunn, V. (2014). Exercise for the management of cancer-related fatigue in lung cancer: A systematic review. European Journal of Cancer Care, 24, 4–14.
Three of the 10 studies showed a significant reduction in fatigue with exercise, one using aerobic exercise, one using chest physiotherapy, and one using pulmonary rehab. The other studies showed improvement but did not reach statistical significance. All studies were level 4 or 5 evidence (low). Studies with significant results, however, were not similar in their exercise intervention. Exercise was safe and feasible for adults with lung cancer. All studies provided exercise under supervision, and most included aerobic and interval training
\"This current review shows that exercise is beneficial and safe in lung cancer-related fatigue; however, the studies are small and, without any control groups, are lacking clinically significant effects. Thus, exercises could be used in the management of cancer-related fatigue in lung cancer in view of the available evidence in other cancer cohorts with due caution. There is an urgent need of further research with adequate sample size, preferably randomized controlled trials, to evaluate the effect of exercise in this cancer cohort” (p. 10).
In light of studies on the effects of exercise in other diseases, exercise can be considered for the management of fatigue in patients with lung cancer with attention to performance status. Patients perhaps should undergo individual testing and exercise prescription. Additional research is needed.
Papas, A.S., Clark, R.E., Martuscelli, G., O’Loughlin, K.T., Johansen, E., & Miller, K.B. (2003). A prospective, randomized trial for the prevention of mucositis in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplantation, 31, 705–712.
Patients rinsed with 30 ml of calcium phosphate at least four times per day. Patients also received four topical treatments of 1% fluoride as neutral 2% sodium fluoride gel administered by tray at the screening visit and completed prior to hospitalization.
Patients in the control group received an aqueous 0.01% sodium fluoride rinse. Prior to transplantation, the control group received four topical treatments with a placebo gel administered with the same technique as the experimental group. During transplantation, patients used the sodium fluoride rinse at least four times daily, 30 ml each time.
Patients who developed severe mucositis were instructed to rinse up to 10 times per day with their solution.
All patients received acyclovir and antifungal prophylaxis per protocol.
This was a randomized, controlled trial.
The National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research scale was used.
The following were measured and recorded.